Lenovo 00YJ448

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardLenovo 00YJ448  (all builds)
Memory31.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170130
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 18:06
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 79
43% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 324
28% 237 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5210 598GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 313 312 314 319 266 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
248% Outstanding
Read 2998
Write 3,014
Mixed 2,935
SusWrite 310
518% 2,314 MB/s
4K Read 87.8
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 81
281% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 358
310% 455 MB/s
Poor: 244%
This bench: 248%
Great: 248%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 194 196 193 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 180
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 195
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
220% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
471GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 159 146 166 158 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 34.2
Write 36.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 137
83% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.8% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 26.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback