Asrock 880GMH/U3S3

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 880GMH/U3S3 (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '19 at 20:26
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80 4,468 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 76 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 94 47% 72.4 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 137 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.73% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 3.97 4% 4.3 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.09 4% 4.79 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.73% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 98 101 81 100 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 190 Write 180 Mixed 190 SusWrite 94.7 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 22.1 71% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.8 DQ Write 52.7 DQ Mixed 34.4 28% 38 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 554GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 106 103 93 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 112 Write 112 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 100 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 67GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 57 58 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 64.3 Write 56.9 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 57.1 74% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 160% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 4x2GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.1% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 11.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.3 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 880GMH/U3S3 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GMH/U3S3

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	1x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	1x

GPU
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples	1x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	1x
KingFast 256GBBench 72%, 7,147 samples	1x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 7,510 samples	2x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,248 samples	1x
RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 2,171 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16