Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9600 323 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 58.1 1-Core 16.7 2-Core 31.8 27% 35.5 Pts	4-Core 39.9 8-Core 35.2 5% 37.6 Pts	64-Core 41.9 3% 41.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Dell(1028 0277) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.28% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.31 fps	MRender 0.24 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.39 0% 0.35 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.28% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC064GMMJ 64GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJSA SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 7.1 16 22 7.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 101 Write 71.8 Mixed 114 SusWrite 23.3 17% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 12.8 40% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 17.8 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 21.3 19% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 36%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 64GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 53GB free Firmware: 01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.3 6.8 6.5 6.5 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	4.14% Terrible	Read 6.8 Write 6.2 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6.5 5% 6.57 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.4 276% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.14% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 1024, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16