Supermicro X9DRW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9DRW  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRW
Memory13.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime47.7 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 20:18
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 66.7
32% 50.3 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 466
40% 344 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 238GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 183 159 168 173 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 177
Write 209
Mixed 195
SusWrite 177
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 22.6
75% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 142
107% 143 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 129%
OWC Mercury Elec 60GB
24GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 51 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
Read 198
Write 55.3
Mixed 85
SusWrite 50.7
21% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 21.2
75% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 25.6
25% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965433-143.A00LF 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.2% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Supermicro X9DRW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback