Samsung 800G5M/800G5W

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 800G5M/800G5W  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP800G5M-XG1BR
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '19 at 19:56
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 109
46% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 270
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Sanyo(144D C790) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4639
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 3
2% 8.14 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 6.3
4% 4.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 51 64 67 56 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 54
Write 58.4
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 57.7
36% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 71%
SDHC Card 32GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 16.5
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 17.7
26% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
72% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 33%
IS817 innostor 16GB
12GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 6.9 8 7.9 8 7.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Read 6
Write 7.7
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 7.8
9% 6.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.2% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 800G5M/800G5W Builds (Compare 346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 800G5M/800G5W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback