Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 67 2-Core 129 60% 95.7 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 375 38% 307 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 20 18% 19.6 fps	MRender 25.4 Gravity 22.3 Splatting 16.8 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMS-32L6M-HP 32GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: DM51707 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 240 Write 79 Mixed 116 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 20.8 74% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 44.2 DQ Mixed 72.2 54% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 HMT41GV7BMR4C-H9 MXIC 25L8005 57GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 33792 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 10.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	88x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16