Asus A8N-SLI Premium

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A8N-SLI Premium  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060118
Uptime19.3 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 19:33
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 4000+
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 31.7
31% 41.6 Pts
4-Core 31.8
8-Core 12.6
4% 22.2 Pts
64-Core 35
2% 35 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Asus(1043 8243) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 0.75
2% 2.42 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 86 52 45 56 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 87.7
Write 89.9
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 66.4
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 2.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 0.2
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A8N-SLI Premium Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A8N-SLI Premium

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback