Today's hottest deals

Asrock J3455M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock J3455M  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 20:10
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Memory 24.1
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 56.8
22% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 138
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7463
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.69
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000340NS 44X2455 42C0423IBMV 1TB
535GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 67 80 66 53 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 75.7
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 62.4
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unde 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 292
14% 292 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J3455M Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J3455M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback