Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.1 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '19 at 11:35
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 22 1-Core 107 2-Core 185 53% 105 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 396 50% 380 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.4% Average	Lighting 55.8 Reflection 59.2 Parallax 50.8 46% 55.3 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 54.7 Splatting 49.1 45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 57 62 68 79 58 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.8% Poor	Read 203 Write 180 Mixed 198 SusWrite 67.1 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 14.1 48% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 72.6 DQ Write 41.1 DQ Mixed 25 27% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 129GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 25GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 76 90 74 78 58 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.7% Below average	Read 219 Write 197 Mixed 159 SusWrite 77.3 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 15.7 50% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 35 DQ Mixed 23.2 31% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 83%
Red Hat VirtIO 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 535GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 100 103 101 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 91.7 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 100 64% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x7GB 828 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 306 13% 306 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5900X 12-CoreAMDBench 92%, 160 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 64%, 25 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	143x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 124% - Outstanding

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350