PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 27 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920x1200x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130130 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 13 '19 at 16:37 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 121 122 123 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD30EZRZ-00Z 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 101 95 98 109 MB/s
|
64.3%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 194 194 194 192 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
482GB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 122 121 122 123 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |