Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 00:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 131
57% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 184
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Zotac(19DA 1184) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 9.09
9% 10.8 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 12
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 268 283 287 283 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 324
Write 288
Mixed 269
SusWrite 269
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 15.1
70% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 19.6
27% 46 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.8
Write 8
Mixed 5.5
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-1600Mh Ramsta-1600MH 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.8% Below average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback