Lenovo 23257G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 23257G6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 23257G6
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '19 at 14:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 132
59% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 218
27% 208 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 3.16
4% 4.59 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.7
5% 5.56 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
990GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 392 377 357 381 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 372
Write 370
Mixed 310
SusWrite 381
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 31
92% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 335
254% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 06C1 SSA302G08-GDJ1C 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback