Dell Latitude E7250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E7250  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0TVD2T
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20191003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 154
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 261
33% 252 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Dell(1028 062D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3977
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 5.73
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 7.06
5% 5.91 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.43
5% 5.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM871 mSATA 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 102 99 97 93 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 476
Write 126
Mixed 165
SusWrite 98.9
47% 217 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 37
133% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 166
144% 221 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7250 Builds (Compare 1,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback