Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 29.4 1-Core 29.3 2-Core 96.3 27% 51.7 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 121 20% 144 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 2.87 Reflection 3.27 Parallax 2.38 2% 2.84 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 0.04 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256G 250GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0330B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 324 300 292 282 322 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 329 Write 295 Mixed 245 SusWrite 306 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 13.4 72% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 33 52% 96.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 59%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 10 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 9.3 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 9.6 14% 12 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 258 16% 258 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	13x
Pentium J4205IntelBench 35%, 25 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	12x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16