Hp-pavilion WL249AA-ABF MS229fr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion WL249AA-ABF MS229fr  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard Capirona
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091126
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 15 '16 at 19:36
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
Socket S1G2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 45
30% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 45.2
8-Core 44.6
6% 44.9 Pts
64-Core 45.9
3% 45.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 903A) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8660
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2
2% 2.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
508GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 91.1
Write 82
Mixed 74.4
62% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.38
84% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
6GB free, PID c753
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Read 17
Write 5.87
Mixed 7.72
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.13
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.005
8% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.3
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback