MSI MS-17C6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL73 8RC
MotherboardMSI MS-17C6  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User NCL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 225
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 688
69% 562 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 121A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 26
Parallax 6.22
5% 12.7 fps
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 13.5
9% 9.42 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 142 139 139 137 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 634
Write 465
Mixed 514
SusWrite 172
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 24
135% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 158
123% 171 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 115%
STT_FTA480MM25 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: O0803B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 340 348 145 73 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81% Excellent
Read 429
Write 322
Mixed 273
SusWrite 220
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 41.2
121% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 224
181% 254 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17C6 Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback