HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 06 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 202
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 379
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 47.2
47% 52.8 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 48.9
39% 47.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 480G 480GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 115
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 25 3.6 11 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 346
Write 88.1
Mixed 135
SusWrite 17.9
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 32
126% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 88.6
72% 103 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 103%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 10GB
7GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 3.4 7.7 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
Read 318
Write 78.8
Mixed 127
SusWrite 16.7
29% 135 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 27
99% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 95.5
77% 110 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
11GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 29 32 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 111
Write 111
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 30.4
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 61%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 119GB
75GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 75.9
Write 80.2
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 17
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 Kingston HP698650-154-KEF 1352 SUPERTALENT02 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback