Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DA7/E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DA7/E  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DA7/E
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181002
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 07:56
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 56.4
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 190
62% 114 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 700
61% 521 Pts
64-Core 1,782
110% 1,782 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 115
Parallax 108
89% 111 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 104
Splatting 104
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$32
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 65 91 93 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 114
Write 117
Mixed 71
SusWrite 75
70% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DA7/E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DA7/E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback