Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory114.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '20 at 16:47
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 644
60% 499 Pts
64-Core 1,412
87% 1,412 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W4100
AMD(1002 2B1E) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 10
Parallax 9.91
6% 9.1 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.28 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 433 457 447 458 455 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 377
Write 384
Mixed 386
SusWrite 439
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 27.9
94% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 307
232% 312 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
112% Outstanding
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 42.1
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 18
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 112%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $899
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback