Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Monster TULPAR T7 V15.1

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V15.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook TULPAR T7 V15.1
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '20 at 05:44
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 94.3 1-Core 153 2-Core 304 101% 184 Pts	4-Core 589 8-Core 1,186 105% 888 Pts	64-Core 1,183 73% 1,183 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 7710) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.4% Average	Lighting 47.9 Reflection 55.4 Parallax 45 39% 49.4 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 48 Splatting 62.6 49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59 34,063 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,661 Write 1,043 Mixed 1,183 356% 1,629 MB/s	4K Read 69.8 4K Write 186 4K Mixed 89.3 318% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 62.1 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 90.4 77% 108 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 77GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 151 151 151 150 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 494 Write 465 Mixed 353 SusWrite 185 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 97.3 4K Mixed 52.1 177% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 34 DQ Write 88.4 DQ Mixed 44.9 39% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 275GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 159 161 161 161 161 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 98 Write 146 Mixed 68 SusWrite 158 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GB 758 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 24.1 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 26.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V15.1 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V15.1

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $160Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	22x
Core i7-9700KIntel $240Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	23x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	1x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	4x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	4x
XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $40Bench 119%, 8,737 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x
F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 82%, 2,421 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370