Today's hottest deals

HP CQ1110LA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP CQ1110LA  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ACA
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '20 at 01:14
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Memory 27.9
1-Core 9.9
2-Core 18
14% 18.6 Pts
4-Core 19.6
8-Core 37.5
3% 28.5 Pts
64-Core 35.5
2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 2ACA) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.861.0.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.36 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 80 80 79 68 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 47.4
Write 40.1
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 74.4
36% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.83 GB/s
Latency 267
15% 267 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CQ1110LA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP CQ1110LA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback