Today's hottest deals

Samsung 730U3E/740U3E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 730U3E/740U3E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP740U3E-S02UK
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140226
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 30 '16 at 17:04
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 112
55% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 147
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0E8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 2.66
3% 3.69 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 6.78
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
HGST HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
127GB free, PID 8014
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 38.2
Mixed 35.3
47% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.21
4K Mixed 0.04
9% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 53%
Seagate Portable 500GB
5GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 23.3
Mixed 15.7
26% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.11
24% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730U3E/740U3E Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 730U3E/740U3E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback