Nexstgo NS14N1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNexstgo NS14N1  (all builds)
MotherboardNexstgo NS14N1
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 14:37
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 524
58% 457 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1DC2 3107) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 7.38
6% 7.69 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 82 73 94 83 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 17.8
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 80.7
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC8T1-B5KS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS14N1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Nexstgo NS14N1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback