Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '20 at 10:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 148
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 222
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.43
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 11.7
8% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 13.3
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
bulldozer-120GB 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 912XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 75 64 66 67 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.6% Average
Read 253
Write 170
Mixed 174
SusWrite 76.9
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 21.4
95% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 96.9
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 88.4
82% 123 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST500DM002 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 183 175 184 183 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 178
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 172
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback