QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	6 GB free of 7 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '17 at 16:26
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 271 95% 169 Pts	4-Core 555 8-Core 555 74% 555 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Asus(1043 3006) 3GB CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1555 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Lighting 51.3 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 67.8 42% 51.3 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 50.5 Splatting 43 35% 42 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial C300 226GB 81GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	47.4% Average	Read 351 Write 216 Mixed 264 61% 277 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 4.57 56% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 18 37% 75.3 MB/s

Qemu HARDDISK 30GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	47% Average	Read 388 Write 155 Mixed 230 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 11.4 60% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 89.6 DQ Mixed 15.7 34% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 66%
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 13GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	38.5% Below average	Read 279 Write 136 Mixed 187 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 8.62 52% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 92.9 DQ Write 78.8 DQ Mixed 14.3 30% 62 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 55%
Red Hat VirtIO 5GB 4GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x7GB 828 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 37.2 MC Write 40.2 MC Mixed 33.6 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 38.6 SC Mixed 29.7 86% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16