Nexstgo NX101

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNexstgo NX101  (all builds)
MotherboardNexstgo Nexstgo
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 06:22
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 198
59% 108 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 346
43% 328 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1DC2 3101) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 7.91
6% 8.19 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 7.03
Splatting 15.2
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_IM2S3338-512GD 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 409 423 409 408 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 409
Mixed 350
SusWrite 408
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 42
120% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 263
211% 294 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC8T1-B5KS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NX101 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Nexstgo NX101

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback