Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	87.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150601
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '20 at 13:02
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 35.8 2-Core 84.5 41% 63.4 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 350 28% 246 Pts	64-Core 1,276 79% 1,276 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 300GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8.32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 185 181 186 184 184 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 91%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 215GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 173GB free Firmware: 0.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 116 107 107 106 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.5% Poor	Read 194 Write 44.1 Mixed 193 SusWrite 105 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 2.5 22% 6.83 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 98.1 DQ Mixed 219 146% 179 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 64%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 698GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 192GB free Firmware: 0.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 15 12 12 9.3 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.2% Poor	Read 84 Write 39.2 Mixed 137 SusWrite 15.6 15% 68.9 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 4.4 29% 8.73 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 180 138% 187 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 51%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 698GB 339GB free Firmware: 0.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 116 106 107 106 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.6% Below average	Read 214 Write 194 Mixed 196 SusWrite 105 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 4.2 43% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 174 125% 159 MB/s

Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 430GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 189GB free Firmware: 0.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 115 105 107 105 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.8% Average	Read 265 Write 52.3 Mixed 194 SusWrite 103 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 13 51% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 216 160% 214 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 47%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 215GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 200GB free Firmware: 0.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 114 107 105 104 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.8% Below average	Read 179 Write 163 Mixed 137 SusWrite 104 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 12.3 46% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 196 143% 189 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HP 689911-071 16x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 32.9 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.4 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback