Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X411QA_A411QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X411QA_A411QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X411QA
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 09:37
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 92.2
47% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 146
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 18E1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.16.04
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 5.09
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 4.43
3% 3.99 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 82 93 84 83 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 677
Write 414
Mixed 539
SusWrite 103
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 25.2
113% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 209
156% 207 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 190%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 135 136 133 134 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 109
Write 125
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 128
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8.7
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X411QA_A411QA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X411QA_A411QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback