Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 21:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 207
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 302
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 5.57
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.78
4% 7.9 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 5.63
Splatting 10.8
7% 7.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Philips SATA SSD 240GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 433 433 444 442 439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 401
Write 412
Mixed 369
SusWrite 434
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 39.7
139% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 207
178% 260 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSTK.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback