Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ 260 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 28.9 35% 45 Pts	4-Core 31.8 8-Core 31.8 4% 31.8 Pts	64-Core 31.5 2% 31.5 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT 8,099 User benchmarks, average bench 2% POV(1ACC 844E) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 0.78 2% 2.44 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 3.39 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ts32gssd 420K 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: O122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 41 44 49 51 51 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.3% Below average	Read 114 Write 45.8 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 46.7 15% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 22 74% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 50.7 DQ Mixed 30.1 26% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 512, 512, 1024, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+AMDBench 41%, 5,594 samples	4x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+AMD $84Bench 34%, 2,640 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples	1x

GPU
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples	1x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16