Today's hottest deals

MSI AM1M (MS-7865)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7865
MotherboardMSI AM1M (MS-7865)  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141030
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateMar 03 '20 at 13:25
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 24.2
2-Core 49.5
28% 42 Pts
4-Core 93
8-Core 98.4
13% 95.7 Pts
64-Core 96.8
6% 96.8 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
MSI(1462 7865) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 2.72
2% 3.06 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 3.04
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 61 64 66 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46% Average
Read 97.7
Write 64.3
Mixed 49
SusWrite 62.5
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905595-011.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.6
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1M (MS-7865) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI AM1M (MS-7865)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback