Today's hottest deals

Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130705
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 09 '17 at 20:41
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 384
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.54
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 37.3
28% 33.9 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 34
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M4-CT128M4SSD2 256GB
134GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.4% Excellent
Read 496
Write 328
Mixed 389
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 17.5
114% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 53.8
75% 129 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 473
Write 178
Mixed 262
67% 304 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 4.95
85% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 12
22% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 72%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
462GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 67.3
Mixed 65.9
51% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.36
84% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 57%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
224GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 111
Mixed 91.6
74% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.53
135% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 75%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
14GB free, PID 0109
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 11.9
Mixed 15
19% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.02
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 1.43
126% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback