Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '20 at 15:16
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 138
62% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 302
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 66
Parallax 57.3
52% 62.2 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 68
55% 67.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 800 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 51 14 39 15 47 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 249
Write 238
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 46.2
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 12
64% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 23.9
19% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6
3GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.1 1.8 3.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 2.3
5% 5.25 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback