Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	0.72% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44 6,294 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.8% Poor	Memory 27.4 1-Core 29.8 2-Core 58 22% 38.4 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 65 12% 82.7 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 0386) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.41 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
OCZ SOLI D 128GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 2.4 1.9 0.7 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Read 7.3 Write 5 Mixed 14.3 SusWrite 4.7 2% 7.82 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 0% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 14%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 212GB free Firmware: 10.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 60 60 59 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 57.3 Write 59.1 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 60 40% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.62% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.4 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 270 15% 270 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 8.62% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $44Bench 44%, 6,294 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x

Value: 30% - Poor

Total price: $475

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16