Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '20 at 08:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 207
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 673
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 82
52% 71.3 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 55.9
50% 62 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 75GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 179 55 55 56 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 415
Write 354
Mixed 342
SusWrite 113
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 29.3
95% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 170
141% 210 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%
UFD USB Flash Drive 32GB
15GB free, PID a832
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 18
Write 5.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 8.2
10% 8.93 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback