HP ZBook 15 G5

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ZBook 15 G5 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 842A
Memory	27.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190215
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration	423 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8850H 20,669 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 79.1 2-Core 157 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 478 49% 395 Pts	64-Core 637 39% 637 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 842A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.46% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 7.62 6% 13.2 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 15.6 9% 11 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.46% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB 20,750 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA72H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 518 319 303 298 288 272 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 1,314 Write 778 Mixed 899 SusWrite 333 185% 831 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 37.6 119% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 173 167% 261 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 295%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB 20,750 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 216GB free Firmware: EXA73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 692 796 830 557 558 557 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,748 Write 917 Mixed 960 SusWrite 665 238% 1,072 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 40.8 133% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 389 DQ Mixed 283 226% 311 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 295%
Intenso Portable SSD 240GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 24GB free Firmware: 0506 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 297 224 54 78 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 350 Write 317 Mixed 201 SusWrite 159 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 9 46% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 78 DQ Write 96.2 DQ Mixed 11.2 30% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 634GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 78 78 78 76 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 77.8 Write 59.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 77.3 48% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 989GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 93 92 92 91 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 92.7 Write 75 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 90.8 58% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 67%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 155 158 160 152 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 111 Write 126 Mixed 113 SusWrite 153 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.7 302% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 90%
HGST 1TB 1,195 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 812GB free, PID 1014 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 89 87 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 72.3 Write 70 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 87.3 86% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 43%
Intenso Ultra Line 126GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 56GB free, PID 0903 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 10 11 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.39% Terrible	Read 35 Write 34 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 17.1 39% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.39% Great: 51%
SMI USB DISK 8GB 3,022 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.5 6.4 6.1 6.3 6.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	6.31% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 1.2 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 5.9 9% 9.33 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 10%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 98 98 98 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 99.5 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 96.7 126% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.8 229% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 61%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 360GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 38 Write 40 Mixed 34.7 SusWrite 41.6 53% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 22%
TOSHIBA HDWR21E 14TB 11.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 240 239 242 242 238 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	92.8% Outstanding	Read 240 Write 218 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 240 254% 193 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.13 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD M471A2K43CB1-CTD M471A2K43CB1-CTD 48GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 17.7 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 18.7 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBook 15 G5 Builds (Compare 1,367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G5

CPU
Core i7-8850HIntelBench 71%, 20,669 samples	911x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	267x
Xeon E-2176MIntelBench 77%, 4,000 samples	90x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	635x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	420x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	236x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	338x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $37Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	137x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 216%, 1,262 samples	66x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	178x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 81%, 4,980 samples	89x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16