Asus E200HA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus E200HA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E200HA
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '17 at 23:16
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
‡, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 39.9
1-Core 9.9
2-Core 31.9
19% 27.2 Pts
4-Core 60.2
8-Core 59.6
8% 59.9 Pts
64-Core 59.8
4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 10B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 2.46
Parallax 2
1% 1.96 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung BGND3R 31GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.7% Very poor
Read 153
Write 86
Mixed 111
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 9.42
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 4.32
26% 8.42 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 19.8
DQ Mixed 4.97
7% 13.1 MB/s
Generic APPSD SD Card 67GB
62GB free
Firmware: 0.0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
8.47% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 7.05
Mixed 9.39
9% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.57
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.02
234% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback