Asus P11C-M Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus P11C-M Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P11C-M Series
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2224
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 478
60% 455 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 103 131 118 163 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 671
Write 362
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 160
234% 323 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.4
544% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 239%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965684-013.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (81st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 26.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P11C-M Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P11C-M Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback