Gigabyte GA-880GM-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880GM-USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '20 at 11:24
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 87.9
1-Core 49.3
2-Core 97.3
52% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 253
26% 211 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 71.6
55% 71.1 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 69
Splatting 70.2
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 550GB
498GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 3.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 9
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 3.1
6% 7.75 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.8
479% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 25%
Ccboot iSCSI 8TB
302GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 6.7 6.8 6.1 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Read 9.8
Write 9
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.5
7% 8.82 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 2.9
458% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-880GM-USB3 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback