Today's hottest deals

HP Elite x2 1012 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Elite x2 1012 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FC
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '20 at 14:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m7-6Y75
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 169
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 238
34% 247 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 5.47
5% 6.26 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 13
8% 8.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1006 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10112006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 424 428 431 432 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,392
Write 858
Mixed 853
SusWrite 446
197% 887 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 68.8
235% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 789
594% 795 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 191%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron/Elpida 825630-691 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite x2 1012 G1 Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite x2 1012 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback