PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B86 |
Motherboard | MSI B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86) (all builds) |
Memory | 1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190829 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 19 '20 at 17:34 |
Run Duration | 528 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
75.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
12.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 112 103 82 98 94 MB/s
|
72.4%
Very good
|
|||
hp v165w 4GB
4GB free, PID 5307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.8 4 MB/s
|
4.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
804GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
127GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 31 16 16 16 16 MB/s
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,684x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 424x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 408x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 338x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 316x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 303x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $441 |