Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H170 PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151023
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '20 at 18:35
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	94%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 170 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 387 38% 311 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8619) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.6% Above average	Lighting 69.8 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 59.8 57% 66.3 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 62.6 Splatting 64.7 53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 63 69 67 64 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 256 Write 190 Mixed 221 SusWrite 73.3 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 6.2 93% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 169 124% 159 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 264GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 77 73 77 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 70 Write 64.7 Mixed 53 SusWrite 76.1 49% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125 59,072 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	76% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 25.4 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 20 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	452x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	365x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	328x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	231x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	213x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	185x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	135x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	72x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	123x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	91x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $667

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16