Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8760w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8760w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1630
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150312
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '17 at 18:03
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 41.9
28% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 72.3
8-Core 131
12% 102 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M5950
HP(103C 1630) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.53
4% 4.14 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 5.74
4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
FANTOM HD204UI 2TB
230GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 23
Mixed 23.7
31% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.34
50% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8760w Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8760w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback