TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G750JS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G750JS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JS
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime129.7 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 13:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 142
56% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 366
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 63.4%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 157D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 6.12
3% 11.2 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.48
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.46%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 144 146 135 134 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 245
Write 211
Mixed 218
SusWrite 142
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 17.2
60% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 160
118% 154 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 43.8%
 Great: 85%
TEAML5Lite3D480G 480GB
295GB free
Firmware: R0430A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 355 191 73 42 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 352
Write 381
Mixed 358
SusWrite 147
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 9.03 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 32.2%
 Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 99U5428-018.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.1
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 51.5%
 Great: 70%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel  $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples210x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples115x
Core i7-4712HQIntelBench 61%, 5,396 samples1x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples208x
GTX 870MNvidiaBench 22%, 3,247 samples118x
SSD
mSATA SD5SE2256G1002E 256GBSanDiskBench 71%, 860 samples26x
X110 256GBSanDisk  $100Bench 79%, 4,989 samples16x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples9x
RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples79x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples26x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples16x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback