Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 14:58
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$42
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 100
45% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 128
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20
17% 19.6 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 17.3
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 210 192 191 206 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 258
Write 225
Mixed 160
SusWrite 192
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 16
54% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 140
127% 193 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
722GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 158 164 167 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 150
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 159
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 6
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 1,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback