Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 40.7 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 59.3 27% 43.5 Pts	4-Core 88 8-Core 89.8 12% 88.9 Pts	64-Core 87.6 5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.43 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.46 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 4.74 3% 3.29 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Starsway-N210 60GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0809B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 43 47 44 44 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 315 Write 258 Mixed 170 SusWrite 57.7 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 5.8 56% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 77.8 DQ Mixed 23.5 40% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB 1,884 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 3.8 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM