Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E558

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E558  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2B7
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191120
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 12 '20 at 11:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 189
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 249
44% 307 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Fujitsu(10CF 1959) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 7.78
0% 5.99 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 6.87
Splatting 14.4
8% 9.51 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TN8W-256G-1016 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106116
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 147 137 152 135 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 458
Write 286
Mixed 260
SusWrite 149
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 41.1
135% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 225
190% 278 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E558 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E558

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback