Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 23:09
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 80.3
42% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 84.1
8-Core 81.9
11% 83 Pts
64-Core 67.1
4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 34.7
23% 31.7 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 37.2
25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.1 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 91.7
Write 1.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 1.8
19% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 60%
Samsung SP1604N 160GB-$43
132GB free
Firmware: TM100-24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 59 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 53
Write 53.7
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 58.4
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.1% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback