Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 24 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 55.1 20% 35.5 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 106 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8245) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 2.81 2% 3.12 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 3.3 2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT-032G-1006 32GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2311006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 44 45 44 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 130 Write 41.2 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 41.4 15% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 5.8 25% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 293 14% 293 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16