Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 23:40
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 210
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 543
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.16.06
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 15.6
10% 13.2 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 17.7
11% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 262 263 246 380 247 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 638
Write 668
Mixed 542
SusWrite 312
121% 540 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 33.6
102% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 695
DQ Write 613
DQ Mixed 472
404% 593 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 131%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
2GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 17.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.6
10% 9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.6
185% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback